Ecdysozoa

Ecdysozoa

Ecdysozoa
Temporal range: Early Cambrian–Recent
Є
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
A centipede (Arthropoda)
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Clade: Nephrozoa
(unranked): Protostomia
Superphylum: Ecdysozoa
Aguinaldo et al., 1997
Phyla

Ecdysozoa is a group of protostome animals,[1] including Arthropoda (insects, chelicerata, crustaceans, and myriapods), nematoda, and several smaller phyla. They were first defined by Aguinaldo et al. in 1997, based mainly on phylogenetic trees constructed using 18S ribosomal RNA genes.[2] A large study in 2008 by Dunn et al. strongly supported the Ecdysozoa as a clade, that is, a group consisting of a common ancestor and all its descendants.[3]

The group is also supported by morphological characters, and includes all animals that shed their exoskeleton (see ecdysis).

The group was initially contested by a significant minority of biologists. Some argued for groupings based on more traditional taxonomic techniques,[4] while others contested the interpretation of the molecular data.[5][6]

Contents

  • Group characters 1
  • Group membership 2
  • Alternative groupings that used to be favoured before Ecdysozoa gained widespread acceptance 3
    • Articulata hypothesis 3.1
    • Coelomata hypothesis 3.2
  • References 4
  • External links 5

Group characters

A tardigrade (water bear) and a nematode (roundworm)

Deuterostomia

Protostomia
Ecdysozoa



Tardigrada



Nematoda


Nematomorpha





Priapulida


Kinorhyncha





Onychophora



Pancrustacea



Myriapoda


Chelicerata






Lophotrochozoa


A phylogenetic tree of the Ecdysozoa hypothesis as suggested by Dunn et al. (2008). Note that this molecular result is aberrant in that it does not recover the widely-accepted clade Panarthropoda (= Tardigrada + Onychophora + Euarthropoda).

The most notable characteristic shared by ecdysozoans is a three-layered ecdysis, and gives the group its name. The ecdysozoans lack locomotory cilia and produce mostly amoeboid sperm, and their embryos do not undergo spiral cleavage as in most other protostomes. Ancestrally, the group exhibited sclerotized teeth within the foregut, and a ring of spines around the mouth opening, though these features have been secondarily lost in certain groups.[8]

Group membership

The Ecdysozoa include the following phyla: Arthropoda, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Kinorhyncha, Priapulida, Loricifera, Nematoda, and Nematomorpha. A few other groups, such as the gastrotrichs, have been considered possible members but lack the main characters of the group, and are now placed elsewhere. The Arthropoda, Onychophora, and Tardigrada have been grouped together as the Panarthropoda because they are distinguished by segmented body plans.[9] Dunn et al. in 2008 suggested that the tardigrada could be grouped along with the nematodes, leaving Onychophora as the sister group to the arthropods.[3]

The non-panarthropod members of Ecdysozoa have been grouped as Cycloneuralia but they are more usually considered paraphyletic.

Alternative groupings that used to be favoured before Ecdysozoa gained widespread acceptance

Articulata hypothesis

The grouping proposed by Aguinaldo et al. is almost universally accepted, although WorldHeritage alleges that some zoologists still hold to the original view that Panarthropoda should be classified with Annelida in a group called the Articulata, and that Ecdysozoa are polyphyletic. Nielsen has suggested that a possible solution is to regard Ecdysozoa as a sister-group of Annelida.,[10] though later considered them unrelated.[11] Inclusion of the roundworms within the Ecdysozoa was initially contested[5][12] but since 2003, a broad consensus has formed supporting the Ecdysozoa [13] and in 2011 the Darwin–Wallace Medal was awarded for the discovery of the New Animal Phylogeny consisting of the Ecdysozoa, the Lophotrochozoa, and the Deuterostomia.

Coelomata hypothesis

Before Ecdysozoa, one of the prevailing theories for the evolution of the Acoelomata (no coelom), the Pseudocoelomata (partial coelom), and the Eucoelomata (true coelom). Adoutte and coworkers were among the first to strongly support the Ecdysozoa.[14] With the introduction of molecular phylogenetics, the coelomate hypothesis was abandoned, although some molecular, phylogenetic support for the Coelomata continued until as late as 2005.[15]

References

  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^ a b
  4. ^
  5. ^ a b
  6. ^
  7. ^
  8. ^
  9. ^ Paleos Invertebrates: Panarthropoda – URL retrieved February 17, 2007
  10. ^ Nielsen, C. (2003) Proposing a solution to the Articulata–Ecdysozoa controversy. Zoologica Scripta 32:5, 475-482
  11. ^
  12. ^
  13. ^
  14. ^
  15. ^

External links

  • UCMP-Ecdysozoa introduction
  • http://www.palaeos.com/Kingdoms/Animalia/Ecdysozoa.html
  • http://www.nematodes.org/tardigrades/Tardigrades_and_Ecdysozoa.html
  • http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~garey/articulata.html
  • http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~garey/essential.html
  • http://www.nematomorpha.net